Due to GH-505 users base is not as many as GH-625, so we decided GH-625.
That is why we recuit more testes to get involved.
How do you think?
I understand why you selected 625 for new features. And I understand why you recruit more
testers for 505. Both is okay.
But I think, when the GH-505 firmware should be the base for future models, than it should
have all features available (including "Interval training" and "Lap by point").
Otherwise you will get only uncomplete feedbacks. As I said before: each of the model
has advantages and disadvantages.
If you want to have feedback for future development, the firmware should contain everything
you have. This won't be possible for 625 - but I think it could be possible for 505.
And I don't believe that it will cause too big efforts to move some already existing functions
from 625 to 505.